Preferences in Qualitative Coalitional Games

نویسندگان

  • Paul E. Dunne
  • Michael Wooldridge
چکیده

Qualitative coalitional games (QCGs) are a variation of conventional coalitional games in which each coalition may choose to cooperate in a number of different ways, with different choices resulting in potentially different sets of goals being achieved; each agent is associated with a set of goals, the intuition being that an agent is “satisfied” if any of its goals are achieved, but is indifferent between them. In this paper, we extend the framework of QCGs to incorporate preferences that agents have over their goals. In addition to establishing some basic properties of QCGs with Preferences (QCGPs), we investigate and characterise the complexity of six natural decision problems associated with QCGPs. For example, we prove that the problem of establishing Pareto optimality of a goal set with respect to some coalition is co-NP-complete. We end with some brief conclusions and a discussion of related work.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Qualitative Coalitional Reasoning with Preferences

Qualitative coalitional games (QCGs) are a variation of conventional coalitional games in which each coalition may choose to cooperate in a number of different ways, with different choices resulting in potentially different sets of goals being achieved; each agent is associated with a set of goals, the intuition being that an agent is “satisfied” if any of its goals are achieved, but is indiffe...

متن کامل

Learning Hedonic Games

Coalitional stability in hedonic games has usually been considered in the setting where agent preferences are fully known. We consider the setting where agent preferences are unknown; we lay the theoretical foundations for studying the interplay between coalitional stability and (PAC) learning in hedonic games. We introduce the notion of PAC stability — the equivalent of core stability under un...

متن کامل

Coalitional fuzzy preferences

The paper deals with the concept of coalitional preferences in the group decision-making situations in which the agents and coalitions have only vague idea about the comparative acceptability of particular outcomes. The coalitional games with vague utilities (see, e.g., [7]) can serve for a good example when some types of the game solutions (e.g., the von Neumann-Morgenstern one) are to be exte...

متن کامل

Coalitional Public Announcement Games

Dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) is a popular framework for studying interaction in multi-agent systems. DELs describe the actions available to the agents, and their epistemic preand post-conditions. By extending standard epistemic models with preferences over epistemic states, we can say something about rational behaviour as well, combining logic and game theory. In this paper we assume that pref...

متن کامل

On the computational complexity of qualitative coalitional games

We study coalitional games in which agents are each assumed to have a goal to be achieved, and where the characteristic property of a coalition is a set of choices, with each choice denoting a set of goals that would be achieved if the choice was made. Such qualitative coalitional games (QCGs) are a natural tool for modelling goal-oriented multiagent systems. After introducing and formally defi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004